This is an outdated version published on 2024-06-28. Read the most recent version.

SEISMIC EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION BY POTENTIAL RISK OF COLLAPSE OF BUILDINGS WITH PBD

Authors

  • Ricardo Ordaz Miranda Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM
  • Eric Fernando Espinosa Cazarin Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-8667
  • Eduardo Reinoso Angulo Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18867/ris.112.656

Keywords:

structural pathology, soft story, probaility of collapse, failure mechanism, concrete frames

Abstract

This article proposes to evaluate and classify the intensity of the pathology of soft story (SS). The SS classification will serve so that, within the universe of buildings that present this pathology, decisions may be made about which buildings require priority attention to avoid serious damage when the next major seismic event occurs. For the analysis, three models were developed based on the geometric characteristics of the most representative cases of buildings with SS damaged by the earthquake of September 19, 2017. The existence of the SS is evaluated using the Complementary Technical Standards for Earthquake Design (2020) and the models are classified by applying two methods: 1) the FEMA P-2018 method; and 2) a proposal for adapting the FEMA P-2018 with the guidelines established in the Complementary Technical Standards of Mexico City (NTC -2020). The results obtained were consistent in each of the cases analyzed, concluding that the application of this methodology allows the identification of the structures with PBD that are most susceptible to collapse; therefore, that require priority attention over others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACI-318-14, (2014), Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318-14), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 524 pp.

ASCE (2016), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-16, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 2, 889 pp.

ASCE (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. In Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Building, ASCE/SEI 41-17, American Society of Civil Engineers, 623 pp.

Amirsardari, A, P Rajeev, H M Goldsworthy y E Lumantarna (2016), “Modelling non-ductile reinforced concrete columns”. Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference.

Buendía, L M, y E Reinoso (2019). “Análisis de los daños en viviendas y edificios comerciales durante la ocurrencia del sismo del 19 de septiembre de 2017”. Revista de Ingeniería Sismica, SMIS. No 101, pp. 19-35. DOI: 10.18867/ris.101.508

Elwood, K.J. and Moehle, J.P. (2003) “Shake Table Tests and Analytical Studies on the Gravity Load Collapse of Reinforced concrete Frames”, PEER report 2003/01, Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.

FEMA (2018). Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Buildings for Collapse Potential, FEMA P-2018, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C, 352 pp.

Gobierno del Distrito Federal (1976), “Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal”, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, México

Gobierno del Distrito Federal (2020), “Normas Técnicas Complementarias para Diseño y Construcción de Estructuras de Concreto”, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, México

Gobierno del Distrito Federal. (2020), “Normas Técnicas Complementarias para el Diseño por Sismo”, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ciudad de México, México

Gobierno del Distrito Federal. (2020). Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal. En Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad de México.

Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM (1977). “Normas Técnicas Complementarias del Reglamento de Construcciones para el Distrito Federal”, Diseño y construcción de estructuras de concreto con comentarios, ayudas de diseño y ejemplos, UNAM, 302 pp

Meli, R., y Hernández, Ó. (1970). Propiedades de piezas para mampostería producidas en el Distrito Federal. Facultad de Ingeniería, UNAM.

New Zealand Standard (NZS 3101.1:1982). (1982). Code of practice for the design of concrete structures.

Ordaz-Miranda, R (2023), “Evaluación y clasificación por colapso potencial de edificios con planta baja débil en la Ciudad de México”, Tesis de Maestría, Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ingeniería, UNAM, México.

Stirrat, A T, A S Gebreyohaness, R D Jury y W Y Kam (2014), “Seismic performance assessment of non-ductile columns, 2014 NZSEE Conference, Beca Ltd, New Zealand, 17 pp.

Published

2024-06-28

Versions

How to Cite

Ordaz Miranda, R., Espinosa Cazarin, E. F., & Reinoso Angulo, E. (2024). SEISMIC EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION BY POTENTIAL RISK OF COLLAPSE OF BUILDINGS WITH PBD. Journal Earthquake Engineering, (112). https://doi.org/10.18867/ris.112.656

Issue

Section

Artículos

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.